Search for: "PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.)"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 7:19 am
In an Order handed down yesterday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for advice on the following important issue in the case of Allstate Prop. and Cas. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
In doing so, rejected the defense's reliance upon the Pennsylvania Professional Nursing Law, 63 Pa.C.S. 211, and noted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had previously rejected the same argument and ruled in the case of Freed v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:21 am
., No. 1:14-CV-00535 (M.D.Pa. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:11 am
However, Judge Jones noted that, in recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decisions such as the Beard v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
It appears that confusion will continue to reign on this issue until the question reaches the Pennsylvania Supreme Court again. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:23 pm
Judge Munley agreed with the carrier's position.The Judge noted that, since there was no Pennsylvania Supreme Court precedent on the issue, he had to predict how that court would address this issue. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:57 am
Richard Caputo followed the Third Circuit's prediction that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would adopt the Restatement (Third) of Torts analysis of products liability cases if squarely faced with the issue. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
LEXIS 91497 (M.D.Pa. 2012), Judge Nora Barry Fischer of the Western District of Pennsylvania in Gross v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
The breach of contract was noted to be the carrier's denial of the request, or settlement demand, for payment of UIM benefits.In so ruling, the court referenced the Pennsylvania Supreme Court case of Erie Ins. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Discussing the claims against Beard the Court stated, “[t]he Supreme Court has made clear that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from entertaining suits by private parties against states. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
Vittini Cordero, 2012 WL 2524772 (M.D.Pa.) [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:00 am
In doing so, the Third Circuit predicted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would follow its 2007 Sackett v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Luddy, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court explained the standard for an award of punitive damages: The standard governing the award of punitive damages in Pennsylvania is settled. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
Although that case was decided before the Pennsylvania Supreme 4 Case 3:13-cv-00534-MEM Document 21 Filed 10/10/13 Page 4 of 7 Court adopted the Hutchinson standard, the Third Circuit correctly predicted how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would decide the issue, citing to Justice McDermott’s concurring opinion in Martin v. [read post]
